# Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot > Claude Code and GitHub Copilot compared from each vendor's own documentation, read on 10 October 2026. If you want an agent driven from the terminal, scripts and scheduled cloud runs, choose Claude Code. If you want Claude models but your company buys through GitHub, choose GitHub Copilot. Canonical: https://fabric.pro/compare/claude-code-vs-github-copilot --- Written by TechFabric, which builds Fabric, an open-source AI agent platform that gives Cursor, Claude Code and other coding agents your team's documents, tickets and decisions over MCP, with sources. Fabric is not one of the options compared here. Vendor documentation read 10 October 2026 ยท by TechFabric ## Where they differ | | Claude Code | GitHub Copilot | | Where it runs | A terminal CLI, extensions for VS Code (and Cursor) and JetBrains IDEs, a desktop app, and claude.ai/code in the browser and mobile app. It also takes tasks from Slack and runs in GitHub Actions and GitLab CI/CD. code.claude.com | Extensions for VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse and Xcode; GitHub Copilot CLI in the terminal; the GitHub Copilot app; and GitHub.com, where the cloud agent works on issues and pull requests. github.com | | Pricing and plans (as published 10 Oct 2026) | Included in Claude Pro ($20/mo, or $17/mo billed annually), Max (from $100/mo), Team (Standard seat $25/mo monthly or $20 annually; Premium seat $125 or $100) and Enterprise ($20/seat/mo billed annually plus usage at API rates). Not included in the Free plan. It can also be billed per token through an Anthropic Console account. claude.com | Free; Pro $10/mo; Pro+ $39/mo; Max $100/mo; Business $19/seat/mo; Enterprise $39/seat/mo. Usage is metered in GitHub AI Credits (1 credit = $0.01): Pro includes 1,500 a month, Pro+ 7,000, Max 20,000, Business 1,900 per user and Enterprise 3,900 per user. docs.github.com | | Agent and background work | Runs as a local agent with subagents and background agents. Cloud sessions on the web keep running with your computer off, routines run on a schedule or on GitHub events, and GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD cover pipeline automation. code.claude.com | Agent mode in the IDE on every plan, Free included. On paid plans the Copilot cloud agent takes an issue or prompt, works in an ephemeral cloud environment, runs tests and linters, and prepares a pull request. docs.github.com | | MCP support | Supported on every surface from the same configuration. Administrators can allowlist or denylist servers, or provide servers to every user, through managed settings. code.claude.com | Supported in IDEs, Copilot CLI, the Copilot app and the cloud agent on GitHub.com. GitHub maintains its own GitHub MCP server. docs.github.com | | Enterprise controls and data use | SSO on Team and Enterprise; SCIM, audit logs and custom data retention on Enterprise. Anthropic does not train on Team, Enterprise, API or cloud-provider traffic by default; Free, Pro and Max users choose whether their data is used. Zero data retention is available to qualified Enterprise accounts. It can also run through Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud's Agent Platform or Microsoft Foundry. code.claude.com | Business and Enterprise add organisation-wide policy management, audit logs and content exclusion, and GitHub states it does not use their data to train models. Since 24 April 2026, interactions on Free, Pro, Pro+ and Max may be used for training unless the user opts out. docs.github.com | | Inline completion as you type | Not stated in Anthropic docs. code.claude.com | Yes: Copilot suggests code as you type, alongside chat and agents. docs.github.com | | Models available, including Claude | Claude models only, from Anthropic directly or through Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud's Agent Platform or Microsoft Foundry. The opus, sonnet and haiku aliases resolve to Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5 on the Anthropic API. code.claude.com | 37 models on each individual plan, from the Anthropic Claude, OpenAI GPT, Google Gemini, xAI Grok, Microsoft MAI and Kimi families, including Claude Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, Haiku 5.5 and Fable 5.1. For Fable 5 and 5.1, Anthropic retains prompts and outputs by default to run safety classifiers. docs.github.com | ## Which to choose - 01 Your team lives in VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains, Eclipse or Xcode and wants inline completion: GitHub Copilot. It suggests code as you type in those IDEs; Anthropic's docs do not describe inline completion for Claude Code. - 02 You want Claude models but your company buys through GitHub: GitHub Copilot. It lists current Claude models, so you can use them under a Copilot seat. - 03 You want an agent driven from the terminal, scripts and scheduled cloud runs: Claude Code. It is a CLI first, pipes into scripts, and has routines that run on a schedule or on GitHub events. - 04 You want to hand an issue to an agent and get a pull request back on GitHub: Either. Copilot's cloud agent works from issues on GitHub.com; Claude Code does this through cloud sessions, GitHub Actions or a Slack mention. ## How the comparison was done Every cell in the table comes from Claude Code 's or GitHub Copilot 's own documentation, pricing or product pages, read on 10 October 2026, and links to the page it came from. Where a vendor's documentation does not say something, the cell says so instead of guessing. Nothing here comes from a benchmark we ran, and the verdicts only follow from the table. Plans, prices and model lists for coding agents change month to month. Check the vendor's page before you buy, and tell us if a cell has gone stale. ## Who wrote this, and their stake TechFabric wrote this page. We build Fabric, an open-source AI agent platform that is neither Claude Code nor GitHub Copilot. It runs as an MCP server, so either one can read your team's record and cite its sources from the session you already have open. We gain if you use Fabric with whichever you choose, and nothing from which one that is. ## Sources Each page below was read on 10 October 2026. - https://code.claude.com/docs/en/overview - https://github.com/features/copilot/plans - https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/agents/coding-agent/about-coding-agent - https://claude.com/pricing - https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/get-started/plans - https://code.claude.com/docs/en/managed-mcp - https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/context/mcp - https://code.claude.com/docs/en/data-usage - https://code.claude.com/docs/en/model-config - https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/manage-your-account/managing-copilot-policies-as-an-individual-subscriber - https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/get-started/what-is-github-copilot - https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/ai-models/model-hosting - https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/ai-models/supported-models ## Questions ### Claude Code or GitHub Copilot: which if your team lives in VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains, Eclipse or Xcode and wants inline completion? GitHub Copilot. It suggests code as you type in those IDEs; Anthropic's docs do not describe inline completion for Claude Code. ### Claude Code or GitHub Copilot: which if you want Claude models but your company buys through GitHub? GitHub Copilot. It lists current Claude models, so you can use them under a Copilot seat. ### Claude Code or GitHub Copilot: which if you want an agent driven from the terminal, scripts and scheduled cloud runs? Claude Code. It is a CLI first, pipes into scripts, and has routines that run on a schedule or on GitHub events. ### Claude Code or GitHub Copilot: which if you want to hand an issue to an agent and get a pull request back on GitHub? Either. Copilot's cloud agent works from issues on GitHub.com; Claude Code does this through cloud sessions, GitHub Actions or a Slack mention. ### Where do the Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot facts come from? From Claude Code's and GitHub Copilot's own documentation and pricing pages, read on 10 October 2026 and linked under Sources on this page. Nothing here comes from a hands-on benchmark. Plans and models change often, so check the vendor's page before you buy. ### Does Fabric replace Claude Code or GitHub Copilot? No. Fabric runs as an MCP server, so either tool can use Fabric's shared record, cited answers and agents from the session you already have open. Fabric is built by TechFabric, which wrote this comparison.